Match reports are something which annoy the hell out of me sometimes.
Looking at the BBC’s coverage of football and rugby league there is a clear gulf in interest in what they think people might want to read.
Taking two match reports, Sunday’s title decider between Manchester United and Wigan Athletic, in the Premier League, and Wigan Warriors verses Whitehaven Warriors in the Challenge Cup from Monday, it is quite clear what their reporters interests are.
Admittedly, Sunday’s Premier League match I have picked was the match which won United the title and the Challenge Cup game was a Round Five match between a Super League powerhouse and a National League 1 average side.
However, 638 words make up the footy report compared to 79 in the rugby report.
This annoys me beacause, as an avid rugby league fan, there are times when I want to read a detailed match report about a certain match, just like you can for ANY football match.
With the footy report there are video links to the after-match interviews with the managers, but just an archived picture stuck in the middle of the rugby report.
Don’t get me wrong, it certainly isn’t just the BBC who tend to prioritise. A lot of other sports websites and newspapers would do well to not restrict “other” sports to half a column in the inside pages of the sports section.



